Discussing politics and religion

Flooring Forum - DIY & Professional

Help Support Flooring Forum - DIY & Professional:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Last edited:
Nope. Something is cooking. The big wad of money exchanging hands, and what they have discovered, I'm betting they are going to give out enough rope and sink some of these crooked senators.
 
Here ya go, I missed one, got 19 out of 20 . LOL Ben always throws me. There's more tests than just one as there are 100 questions on the real test. This is a practice test. https://my.uscis.gov/en/prep/test/civics/view

Here's another with 24 of the 100 questions that I didn't have time for right now. https://www.washingtontimes.com/quiz/2015/feb/11/us-citizenship-test-could-you-pass/#question-1
In 1975 I got a 98% on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Test. ....wow, what a mouthful.
Not the secretarial part, ...the part where it showed you 10 unfolded boxes next to their folded images. You had to match the unfolded box shapes to the ones you thought looked like folded or completed boxes. ............kinda like matching an origami shape folded and unfolded. I'm visual, so don't confuse me with facts, numbers and crap like that.
 
Trump said that Ford was a credible witness and seemed to be a fine woman. That she was compelling. Is he backing off?
He also praised Kavanaugh.
The issue seems to be that there's no evidence to be presented and no witnesses.
... Kavanaugh is presumed guilty by the democrats, angry women and 95% of Hollywood.. We don't know anything, we weren't there.
Ford seems confident but so does Kavanaugh.
Trump's not backing off as much as being fair, which makes some people jaws drop. I try to be unbiased. I don't feel either is lying.
If she's mistaken in her memory from 35 years ago, it makes no difference. Kavanaugh is guilty plain and simple because he's a white male. (edit) ...a conservative white male. If you don't believe me, ask Joy Behar.
Am I biased? I don't think so. I'm pro choice and have not made a decision on if he's a bad pick or a good one. That said, I don't think nominating him would ever change or reverse Roe/Wade.
Seems like a pretty good choice if you eliminate all the hoopla and distractions. He's portrayed as a monster. I see the opposite. Look at his wife and kids. I see a normal family.
 
Last edited:
So I have had an open mind about it. To me I don't believe she should have waited so long. I've been accused of bullcrap like the fake flooring issue. However, seeing his testimony I feel he should not get appointed just because he acted like a little cry baby prick. Not professional and certainly not like a judge should. Plus his opening statement was biased as heck.
 
We're in between a rock and a hard place .. Don't see why we can't hold up the Nominee for ten months like the Turtle head did to Obama ..
 
Some of the forums are already reporting that she is not even a true psychologist, and has committed perjury. "They" demanded a full investigation, and looks like "they" are getting one. Another big concern was the big exchange of money from one Dem to her lawyer. Just as many hope he is found to have lied, I too hope this uncovers wrong doing from the cry babies.
 
And now this....

Maxine Waters denies staffer leaked GOP senators' data, blasts 'dangerous lies' and 'conspiracy theories'
By Louis Casiano | Fox News

Will 'Auntie Maxine' inspire Dems or cost them in November?
U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters on Saturday denounced allegations that a member of her staff had posted the personal information of three Republican U.S. senators onto the lawmakers' Wikipedia pages.

Please read my statement on false allegations regarding the leak of the personal information of U.S. Senators: pic.twitter.com/YBEekR6jBB

— Maxine Waters (@RepMaxineWaters) September 29, 2018
The Los Angeles Democrat asserted that the claims were being pedaled by “ultra-right wing” pundits and websites.

“Lies, lies, and more despicable lies,” Waters said in a statement on Twitter.

The released information reportedly included the home addresses and phone numbers for U.S. Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Mike Lee and Orrin Hatch, both of Utah.

The information appeared online Thursday, posted by an unknown person on Capitol Hill during a Senate panel's hearing on the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

The leak came sometime after the three senators had questioned Kavanaugh.

Conservative sites such as Gateway Pundit and RedState reported that the IP address that identifies the source of the posts was associated with Waters’ office and released the information of a member of Waters' staff, the Hill reported.
oned Kavanaugh.

Conservative sites such as Gateway Pundit and RedState reported that the IP address that identifies the source of the posts was associated with Waters’ office and released the information of a member of Waters' staff, the Hill reported.

Lie and deny Max....just keep lying and denying.
 
And now this....

Maxine Waters denies staffer leaked GOP senators' data, blasts 'dangerous lies' and 'conspiracy theories'
By Louis Casiano | Fox News

Will 'Auntie Maxine' inspire Dems or cost them in November?
U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters on Saturday denounced allegations that a member of her staff had posted the personal information of three Republican U.S. senators onto the lawmakers' Wikipedia pages.

Please read my statement on false allegations regarding the leak of the personal information of U.S. Senators: pic.twitter.com/YBEekR6jBB

— Maxine Waters (@RepMaxineWaters) September 29, 2018
The Los Angeles Democrat asserted that the claims were being pedaled by “ultra-right wing” pundits and websites.

“Lies, lies, and more despicable lies,” Waters said in a statement on Twitter.

The released information reportedly included the home addresses and phone numbers for U.S. Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Mike Lee and Orrin Hatch, both of Utah.

The information appeared online Thursday, posted by an unknown person on Capitol Hill during a Senate panel's hearing on the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

The leak came sometime after the three senators had questioned Kavanaugh.

Conservative sites such as Gateway Pundit and RedState reported that the IP address that identifies the source of the posts was associated with Waters’ office and released the information of a member of Waters' staff, the Hill reported.
oned Kavanaugh.

Conservative sites such as Gateway Pundit and RedState reported that the IP address that identifies the source of the posts was associated with Waters’ office and released the information of a member of Waters' staff, the Hill reported.

Lie and deny Max....just keep lying and denying.
Do you trust those sites, I don't? Both are Republican backed.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top